Dear friends,
Today I bring you a question for which I have not yet been able to have an absolute answer.
What should we teach first? front 3/4 tuck or front tuck somersault? back 3/4 tuck or back tuck somersault?
I would like to close the discussion to the tuck position, which is not so subject to limitations related to the physical strength of the young gymnasts, although the heart of the matter also applies to the pike and straight positions.
I have no doubt that at an early stage the learning of the 3/4 front and back are of a technical requirement far superior to the complete somersault (if we want a correct learning and with adequate vision of the bed), which can take longer to acquisition of mortals (if we opt for the 3/4 first).
On the other hand, if we choose to move directly to full mortals, their learning is relatively rapid, even for kids who are not especially talented. However, the "tuning" of these elements, especially in the take-off and the kick out phase, may require a lot more time than would have been necessary if we had chosen to start with 3/4.
Another hypothesis would be to work on the two simultaneously, but I wonder about the first option. How should we start?
Moving forward a little, the same is true for the introduction to the Baranis. Front tuck with 1/2 twist or front 3/4 with 1/2 twist. To favor a quick learning or a more time-consuming and technically more demanding learning so that one can have the constant sight of the bed?
Does learning by the 3/4 (front or back) slows down the speed of somersault or baranis rotation?
Does learning by the full somersault compromise the take-off phase and the kick-off timing?
What is your opinion?
That hug;
Helder Silva
Today I bring you a question for which I have not yet been able to have an absolute answer.
What should we teach first? front 3/4 tuck or front tuck somersault? back 3/4 tuck or back tuck somersault?
I would like to close the discussion to the tuck position, which is not so subject to limitations related to the physical strength of the young gymnasts, although the heart of the matter also applies to the pike and straight positions.
I have no doubt that at an early stage the learning of the 3/4 front and back are of a technical requirement far superior to the complete somersault (if we want a correct learning and with adequate vision of the bed), which can take longer to acquisition of mortals (if we opt for the 3/4 first).
On the other hand, if we choose to move directly to full mortals, their learning is relatively rapid, even for kids who are not especially talented. However, the "tuning" of these elements, especially in the take-off and the kick out phase, may require a lot more time than would have been necessary if we had chosen to start with 3/4.
Another hypothesis would be to work on the two simultaneously, but I wonder about the first option. How should we start?
Moving forward a little, the same is true for the introduction to the Baranis. Front tuck with 1/2 twist or front 3/4 with 1/2 twist. To favor a quick learning or a more time-consuming and technically more demanding learning so that one can have the constant sight of the bed?
Does learning by the 3/4 (front or back) slows down the speed of somersault or baranis rotation?
Does learning by the full somersault compromise the take-off phase and the kick-off timing?
What is your opinion?
That hug;
Helder Silva
Comentários
Enviar um comentário